<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Firefly Design Studio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireflydesignstudio.us/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireflydesignstudio.us</link>
	<description>Girl Gone Graphic! illustration. identity design. print design. whatever catches our fancy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Big Brands</title>
		<link>http://www.fireflydesignstudio.us/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://www.fireflydesignstudio.us/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pixelchick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brands and Logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireflydesignstudio.us/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stores, employees, and ad campaigns are young and hip. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When logo and identity design come to mind, I always think of immediately recognizable and enduring logos. The <a title="Nike" href="http://www.nike.com" target="_blank">Nike</a> swoosh. The Golden Arches of <a title="McDonald's" href="http://www.mcdonalds.com" target="_blank">McDonald&#8217;s</a>. <a title="Coca-Cola" href="http://www.coca-cola.com" target="_blank">Coca-Cola</a>. <a href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">Apple</a>. <a title="Honda" href="http://www.honda.com/" target="_blank">Honda</a>. <a title="GE" href="http://www.ge.com/" target="_blank">GE</a>. But does an enduring brand always spell for a successful company? The world&#8217;s biggest companies may have enduring marks that typically don&#8217;t change much over time, but what happens when a giant changes it&#8217;s identity and logo?<span id="more-1"></span></p>
<p>Over the last year I&#8217;ve noticed retail superstore <a title="WalMart" href="http://www.walmart.com/" target="_blank">WalMart</a> has been quietly re-branding. Next time you walk into your WalMart, look around. What&#8217;s missing? The ubiquitous smiley face. Replaced by a simple sunburst logo reminiscent of the asterisk. Perhaps they felt the need to update to a cleaner, more generic icon for representation thanks to stiff competition from retailer <a title="Target" href="http://www.target.com/" target="_blank">Target</a>. Unlike WalMart, Target understands the idea of a complete brand. The stores, employees, and ad campaigns are young and hip. Target has successfully marketed famous designers working exclusively for them. The red bullseye is enticing and instantly recognizable. WalMart is clearly working to dust off it&#8217;s folksy image, but still remains less chic in the world of retail branding. Keep your eyes on them, though. WalMart may move slowly when it comes to an identity makeover, but in the end the tortoise won&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fireflydesignstudio.us/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
